|
|
Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Hello,
I'm starting to do some research on the S/C 4.0L V8 in my XJR to prepare for a rebuild at some point in the future.
Has anyone here had experience with forged internals and/or porting and polishing on these engines?
Would a respectable engine shop/builder run into any foreseeable issues as a result of assembling a performance re-built 4.0L block?
Would a professional EMS tuner encounter any foreseeable issues flashing the EMS on this vehicle?
My XJR has approximately 88k and has been running without any major issues since I purchased it some time ago. I would like to continue using it as a DD in the distant future, so I figured this would be a good place to start doing my homework on the subject matter.
|
Richard
MY01 XJR - Titanium Blue Pearl / Black
NAVI / Alpine / XKR-100 BBS Montreals / XKR-100 Brembos / Siemens HID / Mina Gallery / Hüper Optik C30 / MacLeod MKII* (*SOON)
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
You've come to the right place for this sort of information. I haven't actually heard of any mechanical failures as a result of performance upgrades, i.e. "I did the following upgrades to my cars and I threw a rod," There are rumors though that the crank isn't up to huge HP gains, and the www.arden.de engine upgrades replace the crank, but only available for the 4.2 engines.
I don't remember where I found this information, but there was someone who posted pictures of melted pistons on an XK. I did a search, but couldn't find where I saw the pictures.
|
[color=#FF0000]“The person who says it cannot be done should not interrupt the person doing it.” [/color]-- Chinese Proverb
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Changing internals are unfortunately pretty expensive, as you would probably only do this with even more performance in mind.
It can easily add up to $10.000 or more, as it is not just the crank/piston/rods, but maybe also strengthening the block and last but not least stronger valves.
It might be an idea to look for a used 4.2 block instead of rebuilding the 4.0, as these are relatively cheap to get, and are somewhat stronger than the 4.0 blocks (ie forged steel crank, oil jets directed to the pistons). Then we need to find out what the weakest link is, which could be for instance the valves (especially exhaust), and that shouldn't be too expensive, you can have these custom made (forgot the prices).
You could also see if you can strengthen the crankshaft (nitrating or so), though I have no experience with this.
I have no idea about polishing the heads, though it probably isn't worth the money as you can more easily boost up the twin-screw for more power.
Another way would be changing the camshafts via regrinding for instance; though that would be experimenting as thus far I have not heard anyone doing this for our cars.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
My goodness! Wouldn't trading for a 4.2 S/C be a lot less expensive?
|
The guy that dies with the most toys wins '02 XK8 Convertible '01 Goldwing
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Is a 4.2 a bolt in? Or are there mods that would have to be done to get it to work?
Chris
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Hi Chris,
You need to change (reuse from the 4.0) some parts like the front cover, lower bed plate, and some other stuff. The block itself can be interchanged. Best would be to use the heads of the 4.2 also as then you keep the same CR. Some light machining may be required to get the 4.0 intake manifold to fit (the piece with the fuel injectors), which is needed.
However there is a benefit when using the 4.0 heads as you lower the compression (I guess to 8.5 or something) which allows for higher boost pressure after the supercharger, though I have not found a limit there yet, and think for the modest 200 BHP+ twin-screw conversion the stock compression is best, only if you like to go beyond...
All in all I think it is very doable, and some have already done it.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
imho not I think, as it is easier/cheaper to rebuild a used 4.2 engine (so strengthen it further than a stock 4.2 SC which was part of the question) and switch it when you want.
So far my 4.0 block is still holding whilst having more then 560 HP on the engine (assuming a 20% drive train loss).
All depends on how you are going to use the car/engine, racing or continues usage will definitely destroy the engine, no doubt there. However street use (so an occasional usage of the power) and taking good care of the engine seems to work for me so far (125KMiles).
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
avos wrote:
imho not I think, as it is easier/cheaper to rebuild a used 4.2 engine (so strengthen it further than a stock 4.2 SC which was part of the question) and switch it when you want.
So far my 4.0 block is still holding whilst having more then 560 HP on the engine (assuming a 20% drive train loss).
All depends on how you are going to use the car/engine, racing or continues usage will definitely destroy the engine, no doubt there. However street use (so an occasional usage of the power) and taking good care of the engine seems to work for me so far (125KMiles).
Andre.
Andre,
Thanks for the input. I would definitely prefer switching to the 4.2 when the time comes if that option is available at a lower cost than simply rebuilding/re-installing the 4.0 that's there now. So is it a confirmed fact that the crank on the 4.2 is superior to that in the 4.0?
As for the use, I wouldn't be racing the car. I'd like the twin-screw and some stronger internals so that I could continue to daily drive the car for another 100k miles or so, with minimal problems and maximum power output. I think your power levels (450rwhp) would be ideal.
Not to sound repetitive, but is there any update on the Macleod MKII for the XJR?
Richard
|
Richard
MY01 XJR - Titanium Blue Pearl / Black
NAVI / Alpine / XKR-100 BBS Montreals / XKR-100 Brembos / Siemens HID / Mina Gallery / Hüper Optik C30 / MacLeod MKII* (*SOON)
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Some months ago I purchased an Insurance write off (body damage only) 4.2 Lt XKR for the Recaro seats, HID lights and Brembo brakes.
I have been selling off many other parts of the car as all machanics were fine.
I am also keeping the engine so if my 4.0Lt engine does go bang as Andre says I can use most of the parts to go into my car
|
Blue XKR Coupe Engine suspension and body modifications.
Location, Surrey England
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Hi Richard,
I do not have the experience nor facts about the strength of the different cranks, so calling one superior over he other would be a big statement. However the method used and material for the 4.2 crank is known to be stronger. But that doesn't say how strong, as all depends on the design and amount of material used.
But, I assume it is stronger than the 4.0 one. What gives me more confidence is that there is a S-type racing team http://www.ferlitomotors.com/default.asp that uses a stock engine with small performance enhancements (other ECU, exhaust and manual gearbox), and so far I have heard these engines are holding.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
avos wrote:
Hi Chris,
You need to change (reuse from the 4.0) some parts like the front cover, lower bed plate, and some other stuff. The block itself can be interchanged. Best would be to use the heads of the 4.2 also as then you keep the same CR. Some light machining may be required to get the 4.0 intake manifold to fit (the piece with the fuel injectors), which is needed.
However there is a benefit when using the 4.0 heads as you lower the compression (I guess to 8.5 or something) which allows for higher boost pressure after the supercharger, though I have not found a limit there yet, and think for the modest 200 BHP+ twin-screw conversion the stock compression is best, only if you like to go beyond...
All in all I think it is very doable, and some have already done it.
Andre.
Andre,
So are you saying that the 4.0 or the 4.2 heads would be best for the swap?
I realize the lower compression would be more effective for running higher boost, however, would I really need to run much more boost than the OE level with the more efficient KB twin screw? Also, wouldn't there be advantages (notwithstanding the valves) of using the newer generation 4.2 heads? What is the difference in CR between the 4.0 and 4.2 heads?
You've really inspired me to research the 4.2 as an alternative to the 4.0 that's in the car now. Thanks!
|
Richard
MY01 XJR - Titanium Blue Pearl / Black
NAVI / Alpine / XKR-100 BBS Montreals / XKR-100 Brembos / Siemens HID / Mina Gallery / Hüper Optik C30 / MacLeod MKII* (*SOON)
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Guys,
Does a 4.2 block actually fit in a 4.0 hole? I know, for example, that an S-Type motor will not fit in an XK. Are the ECUs, harnesses etc compatible? Just thinking out load here. As Sid said earlier, the internals seem fairly bomb proof (tensioners beside) I have heard of a snapped camshaft although the guy claimed that the engine still ran.
It may be easier to strip the current engine and check all the specs then go for an SDM/Andre TS update. If you are interested in reprogramming the ECU there is a WDS machine for sale on ebay.co.uk at the moment (search Jaguar tools)
I suspect that a 4.2 may also require a ZF 6 as well....
Have fun!
Rich
|
[i][color=#FF0000]Is it time for a beer yet?[/i][/color] Dan an D'Cat have trucks (snicker) Dan's runs on chip fat and D'Cat's is hahahaha 'white'!!
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Hi Rich,
The good thing is that the 4.2 block fits regardless if it is a Rang Rover or Stype 4.2 block, though you need to reuse some of the 4.0 parts. The lower part of the engine is what not will fit (with the oil filter), but that is what you can change with the 4.0 engine. Also the timing chain cover (and front pulley) needs to be reused from the 4.0 block (and some more depending on the 4.0 engine you have, ie AJ27 or AJ26).
Now I haven't done it myself (yet) though I have investigated this thoroughly (have a Stype 4.2 engine block) and I know that 1 person from the UK has already done this, I think his handle was chargerman who provided a lot of good info.
As you are using all the 4.0 electronics, there is no need for new cable looms, and also no need for doing anything with the ECU. Same goes for the gearbox; there is no need to swap (which would be way too expensive anyhow) to the 6 speed one.
Can remember also someone saying the camshaft snapped, however that is not performance related. Even though Jaguar mentioned in the 4.2 improvements list that the new camshafts are hollow to safe weight/lower inertia, these have also been used on the AJ27 engine.
Andre.
PS I am not saying it is needed to move to a 4.2 block, though if you want to strengthen it, it is probably cheaper buy a secondhand 4.2 engine (strengthen it even more, or leave it as it is), and only swap in case the 4.0 engine fails. If it never fails, you can always sell the 4.2 block again, and with my experience so far the 4.0 block is still holding very well.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
I think it is better to use the 4.2 heads also, you probably can also use the camshafts too, I think only the intake is a little different.
The CR stays the same if you also use the 4.2 heads, and also the squish area will be better with the 4.2 heads matching the squish area from the pistons. If you put the 4.0 heads on the 4.2 block, you will decrease the CR, and my best guess would be to about 8.5 (instead 9.1).
You make a good point with the higher boost, so far it is not needed at all to go beyond the boost limits of the current CR, and actually I think if you go that far you first run into other issues like fuel delivery (if the engine can still hold the extreme extra amount of power, as we are then speaking 600 bhp+).
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Andre,
I can't tell you how helpful you've been. I think this is the route I will plan on taking when the 4.0 eventually goes. I don't suspect this will be for quite some time, though, since the car is running quite well notwithstanding the ABS/ESC and low-coolant lights that have been recently coming on for no apparent reason.
As for the ECU/EMS, are you sure that the system from the 4.2 will work?
I've read that the 4.2 incorporates a drive-by-wire throttle system and variable valve phasing, which I don't think are available on the 4.0 engine or ECU/EMS. I imagine there would be additional wiring necessary for these features and I'm not quite sure how they would integrate into the existing engine ECU/EMS harness.
I'm not so worried about the actual engine/dyno tuning, as I have a phenominal tuner in the tri-state area who would be able to flash this system accordingly.
|
Richard
MY01 XJR - Titanium Blue Pearl / Black
NAVI / Alpine / XKR-100 BBS Montreals / XKR-100 Brembos / Siemens HID / Mina Gallery / Hüper Optik C30 / MacLeod MKII* (*SOON)
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
By changing the block, I mean only the mechanical block without the 4.2 electronics. So you would reuse all the electronics from your 4.0 engine. This is why it will work, as I also doubt you can just swap electronics.
Though good point with the variable valve timing, as the latest 4.2 SC engines (so from the new XK and XF models) have variable valve timing. It might still be possible but I have no idea if more has changed. It could maybe still be done (though you need to have at least a new intake camshaft, or reuse the one form the 4.0), but as these engines are so new, you probably will not find these easy secondhand.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
I just did a little more homework.
The '03-07 S/C 4.2L (AJ34S) featured in the XKR and S-Type R does NOT feature variable valve timing. The naturally aspirated (AJ34) version does. Looks like I would be able to run the 4.2L heads with my EMS/ECU after all.
|
Richard
MY01 XJR - Titanium Blue Pearl / Black
NAVI / Alpine / XKR-100 BBS Montreals / XKR-100 Brembos / Siemens HID / Mina Gallery / Hüper Optik C30 / MacLeod MKII* (*SOON)
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
I wonder how hard it would be to fit the upcoming Jaguar 5.0 Liter V8 SC with 500+ Hp?
Will it be a whole new design or just a bored/stroked and improved 4.2, like the 4.2 was an improvement of the 4.0?
|
99 XJR: Brembos, Macleod II exhaust, custom intake
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
It will have direct fuel injection via the head, so that means already the head design is fully different.
There might be a very small chance some components could be interchanged (so cylinder block), but to be honest I think the chances are small.
Best bet to get similar or even more performance is still a TS conversion.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Twin screw the 5.0, if they use the roots type still. :-)
Yea, the new engine probably will be very different. It's about time Jaguar designed a new engine, since they've been using the same one since about 1996.
Avos, I didn't mean using interchangable parts, but rather if the complete engine could be fit in and made to run, with the direct injection. For example, if a wrecked car could be found and you had all the parts including the electronics.
I've often thought about buying a wrecked car (4.2 Liter) and putting that engine in if my current 4.0 ever blows.
|
99 XJR: Brembos, Macleod II exhaust, custom intake
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
Even the 5.0 will be able to be screwed for sure, and that would be interesting ;-).
The electronics would make it difficult to exchange, which is why you can't put a 4.2 engine (with all the parts) into a 4.0 car without changing the ECU and some more electronics, and that would be a tough/price job on its own.
Putting a 4.2 block into a 4.0 car whilst retaining the 4.0 electrical parts (fuel injectors to name just one) is possible. That is why I mentioned that there could be a small chance that a 5.0 block could fit other heads. Small chance though but who knows.
Probably the time (if at all) for the 5.0 will be short lived, Tata has already announced a major investment into reducing emissions, and larger engines might not be the way to go ;-). Considering the options it might be better for Jaguar to opt for a smaller engine size and turbo every bit out of it, or twin screw some.
Andre.
|
2000 XKR 600+ BHP Twin-screw conversion and Limited Slip Differential
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
SteveM wrote:
I've often thought about buying a wrecked car (4.2 Liter) and putting that engine in if my current 4.0 ever blows.
I partly have done that.
I purchased a wrecked 4.2Lt car.
Initially for the Reccarro seats to put into my car.
I then found that the wreck had Brembo brakes and HID lights, these then went onto my car.
I have kept the engine so if required I could put that in.
All other serviceable parts I have sold on helping to offset my costs.
As an update, the Twin Screw convertion on my car is working fine.
Just a bit of fine tuning now as I am getting more used to all that extra power.
Have changed the induction pipe from the air filter to the throttle body and helping the engine cooling.
|
Blue XKR Coupe Engine suspension and body modifications.
Location, Surrey England
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|
|
Re: Performance Engine Rebuild Options
richyp wrote:Guys,
Does a 4.2 block actually fit in a 4.0 hole? I know, for example, that an S-Type motor will not fit in an XK. Are the ECUs, harnesses etc compatible? Just thinking out load here. As Sid said earlier, the internals seem fairly bomb proof (tensioners beside) I have heard of a snapped camshaft although the guy claimed that the engine still ran.
It may be easier to strip the current engine and check all the specs then go for an SDM/Andre TS update. If you are interested in reprogramming the ECU there is a WDS machine for sale on ebay.co.uk at the moment (search Jaguar tools)
I suspect that a 4.2 may also require a ZF 6 as well....
Have fun!
Rich
Wow! A snapped camshaft and the engine still runs?! Depending on where it snapped, it probably took out from between 1 and 3 cylinders (valves not closing at the proper time could run afoul of "run amok" pistons).
|
|
|
Administrator has disabled public posting
|
|